SHARING OF SACRED FOOD AND NEW DIRECTIONS FOR
JEWISH-MUSLIM DIALOG IN POST 9/11 AMERICA 
by Simcha Raphael, Ph.D.

INTRODUCTION

“For we know that our patchwork heritage is a strength, not a weakness. We are a nation of
Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus, and nonbelievers. We are shaped by every language
and culture, drawn from every end of this Earth.” 1
-Barack Hussein Obama

In his inauguration address January 9, 2009 Barack Obama became the first American President
to publicly name the diverse religious traditions comprising American life in the 21st century. Clearly,the religious face of (North) America is rapidly changing. While exact numbers are difficult to ascertain2, today there are approximately 5 to 8 million Muslims in America. As the fastest growing of the world religions, across the globe and in the United States, it is likely that, over time, there will be more Muslims in America than Jews.3 Perhaps, we are moving towards the day when it will be more accurate to speak of Jews as being part of a tripartite American civil faith, with the idea ofa ‘Judeo-Christian tradition’ replaced by values inherent in the ‘Abrahamic traditions’.4

Between changing demographics and the unstable politics of the Middle East, inter-relations
between Muslims and Jews have become increasingly complex and volatile, charged with emotional reactivity and bias. Living in a post 9/11 world, there is an urgent need for communication, dialogue and deeper understanding between Muslims and Jews.

The intention of this paper is to explore an aspect of Jewish-Muslim relationship – the sharing of
food – by examining kashrut in Judaism and halal in Islam. My goal is to articulate an ethic, an
underlying approach to kashrut that can encourage conversation among Jews and between Jews and Muslims about ways to share sacred food that is both halal and kosher at the same time. Ultimately, I advocate for the creation of some form of local and national dual Halal-Kosher certification.

In the first part of this paper, I discuss development of eco-kashrut and its evolution into the
contemporary Hekhsher Tzedek “movement”. Tracking this process over the course of three
decades, I see an example of how a prophetic idea based on values of right relationship to earth and other human beings, can grow into fruition and manifestation. It is the promulgation of new attitudes towards an ethical kashrut that motivates my exploration of halal and kashrut. It also gives me a sense of hope that real societal change is possible.

Next I spell out the basis of a value of “deep ecumenism” as an antidote to the tribal
particularism that has, at times, characterized Jewish life. It is an openness to and the sharing of
mutual spiritualities that is needed to guide any attempt at creating a joint halal-kashrut enterprise.

After looking at similarities and differences between halal and kashrut, in the final sections of this paper, I explore ways sharing of sacred foods between Jews and Muslims. By way of conclusion, I propose the creation dual Halal-Kosher certification in restaurants and on food products.

FROM RENEWAL TO MAINSTREAM – ECO-KASHRUT AND THE EMERGENCE OF THE MAGEN TZEDEK

In the late 1970’s Rabbi Zalman Schachter-Shalomi first coined the term “eco-kosher”, defining
kashrut more broadly as a way of measuring not only approaches to food, but speaking about “a broader sense of good everyday practice that draws on the wellspring of Jewish tradition and wisdom about the relationships between human beings and the earth.”5 Bringing to bear an entirely new understanding of kashrut, Reb Zalman would often ask, “is energy from a nuke kosher?”

Over the next two decades, a number of streams of Jewish life have converged leading towards
creation of a new ethic regarding kashrut. As a leading spokesperson of the renewal movement,
Rabbi Arthur Waskow took Reb Zalman’s visionary idea, and ran with it. Waskow began to write and speak on “eco-kashrut” and in 1988 published an article in Tikkun Magazine envisioning creation of a Commission on Ethical Kashrut which would give due consideration to such Jewish values as oshek – prohibition of oppressing workers; tza’ar ba’alei hayyim – respect for animals; leshev ba’aretz – living with, and not ruining the earth; shemirat haguf – protection of one’s own body; tzedakah – sharing of food with the poor; rodef shalom and rodef tzedek – obligation to pursue peace and justice; and berakah and kedushah – conscious eating with a sense of holiness and blessing.6

In 1990, Waskow convened the first of numerous conferences on the theme of eco-kashrut,7 inviting rabbis from all denominations. Throughout that decade, he continued teaching and writing advocating a new approach to kashrut, relevant not only to food, but applying a standard of ethics to all dimensions of Jewish life. Much of Waskow’s vision of ethical kashrut is articulated in his 1995 book Arthur Waskow, Down-to-Earth Judaism – Food, Sex, Money and the Rest of Life.8

Around the same time, a Jewish environmental movement, while not specifically focused on
kashrut, began bringing into awareness issues of bal tashchit, environmental impact, sustainability, etc. 9 In the past decade as environmental concerns have entered mainstream American life, a “green synagogue” movement10; back to the earth Judaism; Jewish organic farming; Jewish vegetarianism11; organizations like Hazon, which describes its mission as “creating healthier and more sustainable Jewish community – as a step towards a healthier and more sustainable world for all”12; and blogs such as “The Jew and the Carrot”13 have all become part of the American Jewish landscape. The climate has been ripe for a new earth-based, value-based ethic of kashrut.

But it was what transpired after the release of PETA’s undercover video footage of Aaron
Rubashkin’s Iowa kosher slaughterhouse practices that catapulted Reb Zalman’s eco-kashrut vision into the forefront of Jewish community life.14

In May 2006 an article in The Forward by Nathaniel Popper15 exposing abuses at Agriprocessors, Inc. meat-processing plant, brought into public view an awareness of unethical, illegal and questionably halakhic practices at the country’s largest kosher slaughterhouse. This unleashed in the American Jewish community a tumultuous process of studious re-evaluation of the deeper meaning and implications of kashrut. Over the past three years all denominations – but especially the Conservative and Reform movements, which comprise over 50% of the affiliated Jewish community – have begun thinking about kashrut in a broader sense, encompassing both ethical and halakhic standards in determining what constitutes kosher. In the wake of the Agriprocessors scandal “ethical kashrut” with regard to food16 has entered the mainstream.17

As a halakhically-based approach to Jewish life, in late 2006 the Conservative movement
appointed a joint commission from the Rabbinical Assembly and the United Synagogue of
Conservative Judaism to evaluate AgriProcessors and other kosher meat packing plants “to learn about working conditions at the plant, and to establish next steps, if needed, to help ensure worker dignity, safety and rights, within the context of Jewish law, values and tradition.”18 Out of this initial inquiry “The Hekhsher Tzedek Commission” was formed under the direction of Project Manager Rabbi Morris Allen to develop a proposal for creation of what was originally referred to as a tsedek hekhsher, “a certification that the manufacturer has met a set of standards that determine the social responsibility of kosher food producers, particularly in the area of worker rights.”19

The document the Commission produced in early 2008, Hekhsher Tzedek Al Pi Din, is a
testament to the ongoing viability and dynamism of the halakhic process. The Commission identified a number of areas of inquiry – wages and benefits; employee health and safety; product development policies; animal welfare; environmental impact: and corporate transparency and integrity20. Taking study of traditional texts very seriously, the Commission then evaluated a wide pastiche of Biblical, Rabbinic and medieval sources related to these various issues, aspiring to highlight values of righteousness, social responsibility and integrity in business practices as a basis for ethical kashrut.

In addition to the Hekhsher Tzedek Al Pi Din document rationalizing issues of ethical kashrut in
traditional sources, the Commission also created Policy Statement and Working Guidelines21 for implementing a process of evaluating kashrut based upon ethical standards, giving consideration to all those areas of inquiry mentioned above.

After the Hekhsher Tzedek Commission documents were released, both clergy and laity, the
Rabbinical Assembly and the United Synagogue of Conservative Judaism, approved the entire
proposal of the Hekhsher Tzedek Commission. The rapidity of the approval process is itself
significant, highlighting the priority ethical kashrut has assumed in the American Jewish community. But this is only the beginning and not the end of the story.

In April 2009 an organization entitled “Magen Tzedek” was formed, described as “the new
ethical certification seal that will be introduced to the kosher food industry in the coming months”.22

Now, eco-kashrut is about to enter the
food chain, with a symbol of certification
that will not replace traditional hekhsher
certification, but augment it. As the Magen

Tzedek website indicates:
The Magen Tzedek seal will be awarded to kosher food companies based on a number
of criteria having to do with such matters as employee health, safety and training;
wages and benefits; the company’s environmental impact; corporate transparency,
and product development.23

In response to what was a communal crisis in the kashrut industry, the process has moved from
i) Rabbinic study and approval by national organizations; ii) to the beginnings of wider communal education; iii) development of an organizational process for evaluation of ethical kashrut standards; iv) and ultimately, towards marketing and transformation of business practices.

Undeniably, the eco-kashrut idea once envisioned by Reb Zalman has now become viably
embodied in the Hekhsher Tzedek movement, and (at least for the time being) symbolized in the Magen Tzedek “seal of approval”.

No doubt this will affect the nature of kashrut certification, organizational set-up, business practices of the food industry, marketing and sales of kosher foods.

Observing all of this from the standpoint of the history of religions, this is actually a unique and
fascinating phenomenon. In very little time, a community consensus has developed (at least among non-Orthodox Jews), that a traditional Jewish value of kashrut needs to be re-envisioned based upon emerging environmental and food consciousness values of the late 20th and early 21st century. It is obviously happening. This is a very dynamic situation and no doubt there will be progressive changes in the coming years.

FROM TRIBAL PARTICULARISM TO DEEP ECUMENISM: A NEW ETHIC FOR JEWISH-MUSLIM RELATIONS

Developments in the eco-kashrut movement illustrate clearly how in our age even mainstream
religion is being re-formatted so as to be in alignment with religious and spiritual values that support the well-being of the planet. However, in addition to concerns with quality of food, labor relations, animal rights, environmental impact and integrity in business, there are other pressing questions of our age, other ethical issues that have not been addressed by the Hekhsher Tzedek Commission.

In particular the whole question of kashrut and inter-religious understanding is potentially
problematic and requires a new ethic, a transvaluation in the words of Mordechai Kaplan. In order to deal with major religious conflicts of the 21st century, we have to move beyond the old paradigm of Jewish xenophobia which often found expression in kashrut practices.

As part of a long-standing strategy to guard against assimilation, non-Jewish wine, oil, bread,
and cooked foods were all declared off-limits for the Jew. To be a Jew meant to remain separate
from other peoples and religions. For example, Mishna Avoda Zara 2:6 speaks of how bread baked by a non-Jew – Pat akum – is specifically prohibited for Jews to eat. Avoda Zara 35b explains that the purpose of this halakha is designed to limit social interaction with Christians, intentionally reducing the risk of intermarriage. “Why should the Sages have thought fit to prohibit it? As a safeguard against intermarriages!” Tractate Shabbat 17b speaks of this decree as being one of the eighteen decrees issued by Hillel and Shammai, considered to be quite stringent and difficult, if notimpossible, to rescind.24

While this does not explain all the reasons for kashrut practices, it does highlight at least one of
the functions kashrut practices served through the ages. Given the legacy of persecution, it made sense that dietary laws were used to limit social interaction between Jews and non-Jews. But is this necessary or even relevant today, especially in America where, given the inter-marriage rate of over 50%,25 the emerging Jewish community is already multi-ethnic, and diversely religious?

I am not advocating elimination of kashrut practices, as did the early Reformers.26 However, I
am clear that Jewish tribal particularism, based upon restrictive food practices is certainly not what is needed to enhance inter-cultural cooperation in our times.

We need a new ethic for living in a global society to help us think about kashrut and the sharing
of food in an inter-religious context. For inspiration, I look to teachings of Mathew Fox and his
understanding of what has been termed “Deep Ecumenism”. Deep ecumenism is the opposite of tribal xenophobia and religious fundamentalism. It is an attitude towards inter-religious
understanding that assumes divine wisdom has manifested over time in all cultures, all religions.

Using the image of a ever-flowing underground river, Fox writes: There is one underground river—but there are many wells into that river: an African well, a Taoist well, a Buddhist well, a Jewish well, a Muslim well, a goddess well, a Christian well, and aboriginal wells. Many wells but one river. To go down a well is to practice a tradition but we would make a grave mistake (an idolatrous one) if we confused the well itself with the flowing waters of the underground river. Many wells, one river. That is deep ecumenism.27

Deep ecumenism emphasizes the shared truths rather than differences between religions. While particularities and uniqueness is not ignored or under-valued, deep ecumenism seeks to highlight the spirituality that human beings of different religions and cultures can share; in Reb Zalman’s language, the shared God-field. Deep ecumenism recognizes that as human beings, souls in evolution, we are all part of a shared planet, a living organism. And at this critical juncture in human history we need each other for the healing of our planet. In a sense of our survival depends upon it.28

Approaching kashrut from this point of view, I begin with the assumption that Judaism and Islamboth share beliefs about and sacred practices related to food preparation and eating.
From the perspective of deep ecumenism the question I ask here is: how can we use food and
the sharing of food as a way of healing inter-relationships with Muslims? Judaism and Islam have a lot in common. Jews and Muslims are both “People of the Book” and as a result there is somewhat of a common mythic history. Arabic and Hebrew are similar, and in the sense that Judaism is a Middle Eastern religion, (rather than an Eastern European one) there are similarities of cultural styles, certainly between Sephardic Jews and Muslims. And more than any two other religions, Judaism andIslam both share a set of values and practices about dietary laws and the sacred preparation of food.

There are numerous similarities between halal and kashrut. By exploring both the similarities
and differences between Jewish and Muslim food practices, as we shall do below, we can begin to see where and how we might be able to share food with Muslims.

KASHRUT AND HALAL: WAYS OF SANCTIFYING FOOD

Observance of dietary laws has a primary place in the traditional practices of both Jews and
Muslims. For Jews, foods and drink acceptable for consumption are kosher, kasher, raf (Esth. 8:5) meaning “proper”. Laws of kashrut are originally found in Torah, and elaborated upon and clarified in Rabbinic, medieval and later halakha.

In very broad terms, laws of kashrut focus on clean and unclean animals, fish and fowl (Deut.
14:3-10); methods of ritualistic slaughter, known as shechita, and the removal of blood (Deut. 12:21- 25); separation of meat and milk (Ex. 23:19; 34:26; Deut. 14:21); as well as dealing with preparation of food, including plant products; in addition there is a set of special kosher laws for Passover. Food deemed unclean for consumption is known as treifah, which literally means torn or mortally wounded. According to Exodus 22:30: “Do not eat meat from an animal torn (treifah) in the field.” Originally, treifah was one of numerous categories of non-kosher meat; however, it has come to be used in a more comprehensive as non-kosher, ritually unfit foods.29

For Muslims, foods acceptable to eat, understood as good and wholesome foods, are referred to as halal30, legally permissible, from the Arabic word “h_alla”, to undo, free, be permissible. The foundation for Muslim dietary practices is found in Qur’an, and in the Sunna, the practices of the Prophet Muhammad, as delineated in the Hadiths, and subsequently developed in later Islamic law, known as shari’a. 31

In very broad terms, halal laws focus on forbidden and acceptable animals; methods of slaughter and blessing of animals; and the process of removal of blood. All of these relate to the animal kingdom, and dhabiah is the term used to describe the prescribed method of ritual slaughter. One further aspect of halal laws focuses on prohibition of alcohol and other intoxicants. Foods not considered halal are known are as haraam, an Arabic term meaning “forbidden”. In addition to being a description of impure, forbidden food, haraam is also used to categorize certain types of illicit behaviors.32

Central to Islam, and hence to the laws of halal is a belief that Muslims are enjoined to follow
divine orders: “O ye who believe! Eat of the good things wherewith we have provided you, and
render thanks to Allah if it is He whom ye worship” (Qur’an 2:172). The term that appears
frequently in Qur’an is Halal-un-Tayyaban, that which is “permitted, and good or wholesome”.

Thus we find: “O, Mankind! Eat of that which is Lawful and Wholesome in the earth…” (Qur’an 2:168); “Eat of the good things. We have provided for your sustenance, but commit no excess therein” (Qur’an 20:81).

Both Judaism and Islam promulgate an extensive legalistic-based approach to food preparation.
Harold Kushner, speaks of mitzvah as a sacred deed, as a way of taking an ordinary act and making it extraordinary, holy, imbued with a sense of God’s presence.33 Through the observance of laws of kashrut, the ordinary human act of eating food is made extraordinary, sanctified. For Islam, underlying the traditions of halal is emphasis on bringing a sense of purity and cleanliness to the preparation and eating of food. Although these are slightly differing perspectives, both religions seek to transform one of the most basic human acts, eating of food, into a profound sense of encounter with the sacred. Halal and kashrut are comparable, albeit notably different, systems for sacralizing the human encounter with food.

KASHRUT AND HALAL: SIMILARITIES AS FOUND IN THE SACRED TEXTS

From the perspective of deep ecumenism, we want to first explore the shared field of sacred
food traditions found in Judaism and Islam. Below is a collage of texts highlighting points of similarity in the foundational sacred scriptures upon which the systems of kashrut and halal are based.34

ACCEPTABLE AND UNACCEPTABLE ANIMALS:

And the Lord spoke to Moses and to Aaron, saying to them, Speak to the people of
Israel, saying, These are the beasts which you shall eat among all the beasts that are
on the earth. What ever parts the hoof, and is cloven footed, and chews the cud,
among the beasts, that shall you eat. Nevertheless these shall you not eat of those
that chew the cud, or of those that divide the hoof . (Lev. 11:1-4)

O ye who believe! fulfill (all) obligations. Lawful unto you (for food) are all cattle
four-footed animals, with the exceptions named: But animals of the chase are
forbidden while ye are in the sacred precincts or in pilgrim garb: for Allah doth
command according to His will and plan. (Qur’an 5:1)

MARINE LIFE:

These shall you eat of all that are in the waters; whatever has fins and scales in the
waters, in the seas, and in the rivers, those shall you eat. And all that have not fins
and scales in the seas, and in the rivers, of all that move in the waters, and of
any living thing which is in the waters, they shall be an abomination to you;
(Lev. 11:10-11)

MARINE LIFE (CONT’D):

Lawful to you is the pursuit of water-game and its use for food,- for the benefit of
yourselves and those who travel. (Qur’an 5:96)

PROHIBITION – DEAD ANIMALS:

You shall not eat of any thing that dies of itself; you shall give it to the stranger that
is in your gates, that he may eat it; or you may sell it to a foreigner; for you are a
holy people to the Lord your God. (Deut. 14:21)
Forbidden to you (as food) are dead animals (Qur’an 5:4).

PROHIBITION – SWINE:

And the swine, though its hoof is parted, and is cloven footed, yet it chews not the
cud; it is unclean to you. (Lev. 11:7)
He has only forbidden you… the flesh of the swine. (Qur’an 16:115)

PROHIBITION – BIRDS OF PREY OR SCAVENGERS:

Of all clean birds you shall eat. But these are they of which you shall not eat; the
eagle, and the vulture, and the osprey, And the kite, and the hawk, after their kind,
And every raven after its kind, And the owl, and the kestrel, and the gull, and the
hawk after its kind, The little owl, and the great owl, and the barn owl, And the
night prowler, and the gier-eagle, and the fish owl, And the stork, and the heron
after its kind, and the hoopoe, and the bat. (Deut. 14:11-18)

… someone in ihram [sacred state a Muslim must enter to perform major or minor
pilgrimmage] should not kill any predatory birds.. (Sayings of Prophet: Malik’s
Muwatta, Book 20)

PROHIBITION – BLOOD:

And whoever there is of the house of Israel, or of the strangers who sojourn among
you, who eats any kind of blood; I will set my face against that soul who eats blood,
and will cut him off from among his people. For the life of the flesh is in the blood;
and I have given it to you upon the altar to make an atonement for your souls; for it
is the blood that makes an atonement for the soul. Therefore I said to the people of
Israel, No soul of you shall eat blood, nor shall any stranger who sojourns among you
eat blood. (Lev. 17:10-14)

Forbidden to you (for food) ……..blood (Qur’an 5:3)

Although our survery is by no means exhaustive, these texts demonstrate a commonality of
tradition in Torah and Qur’an regarding permissible and prohibited foods. Through interpretation and
elucidation of these texts Jews and Muslims developed comparable systems of dietary laws, ritual
slaughter of livestock, guidelines for food preparation.

KASHRUT AND HALAL: DIFFERENCES AND CHALLENGES

In spite of the similarities, we have not yet demonstrated that traditional Jews and traditional
Muslims can, in reality, share their sanctified foods with one another. The goals of “deep
ecumenism” not withstanding, it turns out, there are significant and perhaps unbridgeable
differences between kashrut and halal, at least with regard to the eating of animal products.
Are kashrut and halal the same? It depends upon whom one asks. According to Qu’ran 5:5: “The
food of those who have been brought the Scripture is lawful for you.” In other words, it’s okay for Muslims to eat food of other Peoples of the Book – Christians and Jews. Based upon this passage, many Muslims in America frequently assume Jewish kosher food standards to be acceptable as halal.

While not the case universally, it tends to be so among liberal Muslims today. Dr. Khalid Blankinship, a Muslim colleague of mine in the Religion Department of Temple University, informed me that he patronizes and comfortably eats food from the same Glatt Kosher deli at a local Acme where I myself shop on occasion.35

However, though kosher meat can often satistfy halal standards, it is not the case in reverse.
There are a variety of differences between the two systems, and for reasons delineated below the laws of kashrut do have a greater complexity to them:36

MEAT

Halal requires that an animal have split hooves. Kashrut is stricter, requiring mammals both
chew their cud and have split hooves. Hence, meat from a camel is halal but certainly not kosher. Additionally, kashrut law prohibits eating the sciatica nerve of animals, hence the hindquarters of otherwise kosher livestock are not eaten. This is not prohibited according to halal.

SEPARATION OF MEAT AND DAIRY

Kashrut prohibits preparation and eating meat and dairy products together. This necessitates
separate meat and dairy dishes in preparing and serving kosher food. Halal does not have any such restrictions.

FISH

Kashrut prohibits all forms of shellfish; some but not all Muslims will eat shellfish.

INSECTS

Kashrut law prohibits eating of any types of insects. [ED. NOTE –To the best of my knowledge, since the Torah permits the eating of six varieties of locusts or grasshoppers, Sephardic and/or Mizrachic/ Eastern Jews permit these. Ashkenazic rabbis decided that they no longer knew which varieties were kosher, and therefore forbade them all.– Editor/ AW] According to Islamic practice, all insects are forbidden except locusts.

In addition, there are ways kashrut practices do not conform to Islamic halal standards:

SLAUGHTER PRACTICES

Halal practice requires saying the name of Allah prior to slaughtering an animal. Kashrut law
does not require a prayer for each individual animal slaughtered.

( Mike’s comment: There was a time, when an animal was sacrificed to a deity, calling on Allah’s name is reaction to ensure that it is not a sacrifice to a diety but for human consumption)

ALCOHOL

Alcohol, even in miniscule quantities, is prohibited in halal foods. Kashrut allows alcohol, as
long as it has no non-kosher ingredients.

This list is not in any way exhaustive. However, it clearly highlights the gap that has to be
bridged around sacred food in order for observant Jews and Muslims to be able to share holy meals with one another. To cross that bridge from tribal particularism towards a global spirituality, deep ecumenism invites us to look ways in which Jews and Muslims can, and have in the past and present been able to share food together.

FROM THE TEXTS TO THE TABLE: JEWS AND MUSLIMS SHARING FOOD AND FOOD CONCERNS

Now, in the spirit of deep ecumenism I will look a number of instances in which Jews and
Muslims have been able to share food together, and point to areas in which future creative
collaboration can take place. I offer this as “an imagistic collage” of opportunities and possibilities for Jewish-Muslim sharing of food, and inter-religious healing.

THE GOLDEN AGE OF SPANISH JEWRY

First, let us imagine traveling in time to Spain in the 9th-11th centuries, to the era referred to as
the Golden Age of Spanish Jewry. In Moorish Spain, under Islamic rule, Jews and Muslims got along
famously, producing an era of tolerance, cooperation and an inter-cultural flourishing in the arts,
literature, philosophy, science, economics, and more.37

We can imagine that repeatedly during this time, Jews and Muslims had opportunities to share
food. How did they do so? What creative and respectful approaches were used to bridge the
differences between their respective food traditions? According to David Friedenreich, a scholar of
Jewish, Christian and Muslim food practices, generally Muslim authorities of the Middle Ages
accepted all Jewish food (except, of course, foods containing alcohol) as permissible for Muslim
consumption. And in the Jewish world “Maimonides (Responsum 269, Blau 515-16) states that “the Sages of the West” would quickly mix honey into their wine when Christians and Muslims approached so that they could all drink together, implying that such commensual interaction was not unusual in Spain.”38 No doubt there is a richness of wisdom to be mined from a study of food practices between Muslims, Christians and Jews during this period of history.

Above all, the point here is that we do have historical precedents for Jews and Muslims finding
creative ways to build bridges and not walls between each other in the realm of sharing of food. And it behooves us to investigate the practices of this era more fully as a potential paradigm for dealing with halal and kashrut concerns in our times.

THE JERUSALEM STEAKHOUSE, MONTREAL, QUEBEC C. 2005

Haaretz newspaper reported a fascinating story of a devout Israeli Jew and a devout Palestinian
Muslim who went into business together running a restaurant serving halal and kosher food. Sassi Haba, a right-wing Likudnik, and Musayid Amla a Palestinian from Beit Ula, near Hebron, met faceto- face for the first time at an Israeli roadblock near Jerusalem. Amla, on his way from Ramallah to Jerusalem, was being harassed by an Israeli soldier unwilling to let him pass through the roadblock. A shouting match ensued, and Haba, who was standing nearby decided to intervene. Speaking in Arabic, Haba was able to calm Amla down, respectfully saying to him: “Everything is okay, you can go through.” Touched by the unexpected courtesy of a soldier in Israeli uniform, Amla quickly asked Haba for his phone number, figuring it was a good idea to have the number of an Israeli solider who speaks Arabic.

Three months later Amla, the Palestinian Muslim called Sasi Haba, whose family owned a
restaurant in Mahaneh Yehuda market in Jerusalem, and arranged for the two of them to meet, and eventually suggested to Haba that he join him in moving to Montreal, Canada and opening up a restaurant.

What’s amazing about this story is that they did just that. According to another article in a local
Montreal news service, dated July 15, 2005, Musayid Amla and Sasi Haba co-own and co-operate the Jerusalem Steak House, a Middle Eastern restaurant in Mile-End, a unique multi-ethnic neighborhood of Montreal.39

According to the article in Haaretz:

In order to maintain a proper partnership, they make a point of maintaining
reciprocity. The meat is slaughtered especially for them so that it will be defined both
as kosher for the Jewish patrons of the restaurant and as halal for the Muslims. In
return for the agreement of the traditionally observant Haba to open the restaurant on
Saturday, the Muslim Amla agreed to sell alcohol on the premises. On Passover they
served matzas and the everyday practice is to play Arab music.40

Reading the story of this restaurant, in a beloved neighborhood in my hometown of Montreal, I
enthusiastically tried to contact the owners to find out more about their joint adventure.
Unfortunately, the phone number I had was no longer associated with the restaurant. I did have
email communication with the Montreal journalist who the wrote the story; Bill Brownstein informed me “the restaurant is no longer in operation. But not due to internal bickering, rather they had landlord issues.”41

I was get excited about the thought of being in Montreal, eating kosher shwarma, while listening to Arab music and drinking Turkish coffee in the neighborhood that spawned the Montreal bagel, and the creative genius of Irving Layton, Leonard Cohen, and Mordechai Richler, author of the coming of age story “The Apprenticeship of Duddy Kravitz” the movie that begin Richard Dreyfus’ career over thirty-five years ago. But I guess not.

But I am inspired by this story. It evokes an image of deep healing between Muslims and Jews. If
Musayid Amla and Sasi Haba can co-create a kosher-halal restaurant, with some modifications, this experiment can be replicated elsewhere. And, in fact, it is being replicated elsewhere.

WILDER DINING HALL, MOUNT HOLYOKE COLLEGE, 2001

During the summer of 2001, Wilder Dining Hall on Mount Holyoke College, in South Hately, MA
was being re-furbished and prepared as the first kosher-halal dining facility at an American College campus. With tedious detail-oriented research and planning, the dairy and meat kitchen was set up, to provide for the dietary needs of observant Jews and Muslims. With a profound sense of irony, the official opening took place September 13, 2001, two days after the Sept. 11 terror attacks on the

World Trade Center and Pentagon.

According to Rene Kroll, Union Manager at Mount Holyoke College, there continue to be
challenges in working with the Jewish and Muslim at students and faculty.42 But the Wilder kosherhalal Dining Hall has successfully been in operation for the past eight years, with every product served acceptable under the dietary rules of Torah and halakha, Qu’ran and shari’a.

The Wilder Dining Hall has become a model for other college campuses. With the growth and
integration of the Muslim population in American society, a trend may well be in the making. In
recent years Brown University and Dartmouth College have likewise established Halal/Kosher dining facilities for students and faculty. With some conscious effort and planning, Jewish and Muslim, and other students are able to share time and conversation together, eating food that is both kosher and halal. Hinei ma tov, u mah nayim, shevet achim gam yachad.

HALAL-KOSHER LABELING LAW, VIRGINIA, 2006

Did you hear the one about the Chabad Rabbi, the Muslim Imam and the Governor? No it’s not a joke – it’s a true story! On October 16, 2006 Governor Tim Kaine, of Virginia, in the presence of
Jewish and Muslims religious leaders, signed into law the first joint kosher-halal labeling law in
United States. Through the lobbying efforts of Chabad Lubavitch of Northern Virginia, in
collaboration with the Muslim community, legislation was created to guarantee “that any food
offered as sale for kosher or halal be labeled with the name of the person or organization certifying the item kosher or halal.”43

This legislation is part of an ongoing process to guarantee consumer protection and quality
control in labeling of kashrut and halal items. Similar lobbying has taken place in New Jersey and New York. What is significant here is that both the Jewish and Muslim communities have worked together. The possibility exists for continued collaboration in this area.

Sales and marketing of both halal and kosher products is continuing to grow significantly. A 2001 statistic indicated annual kosher sales of between $3-5 billion dollars.44 However, in 2008 Lubicom Marketing, which runs the annual Kosherfest in Manhattan, reported an explosive growth in the kosher food industry, estimating an annual $10 billion sales of kosher foods.45

With regard to halal foods, even though most of the 6-8 million Muslims in America observe
halal, there has not been much of a concerted effort within the food industry to market to this
consumer group. There are halal and ethnic grocers found in major metropolitan areas, but halal certification and marketing is not as developed as the kashrut marketing industry. However, the Muslim community is looking at the ways in which the Jewish community has developed kashrut standards and marketing over the past decades, and national and international organizations involved in certification of halal foods, are emerging.

I spoke with Dr. Farhat Quadri, Director of Community Service of IFINCA – Islamic Food and
Nutrition Council, whose logo is a Crescent M – . Much of the work of this halal certification
agency is focused on export to Muslim countries in Asia notably Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore.

However, Dr. Quadri reported that he is also working with American companies for marketing of halal products in the United States, and Canada. There are national companies, like Tom’s of Maine, Cabot Cheese, and Abbot Laboratories that are beginning to market within the American Muslim community.46

I maintain that this is an entirely open area for future exploration and business negotiations with the Muslim community. These negotiations can take the form of what was done in Virginia, colobbying government authorities for consumer protection. But there can also be lobbying and negotiation within industry, leading towards a possible joint or co-certification process of kashrut and halal.

For example, in New Zealand, a company called The Village Press is marketing “kosher and
Halal Certified Olive Oil”. Similarly I was able to find online other food products advertising both
halal and kosher certification, and these images of these products appear on the following pages.

HALAL AND KOSHER CERTIFICATION

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/1-PACK-OF-HARIBO-SWEETS-HALAL-ISLAMIC-KOSHERVEGETA…
W0QQitemZ170326320843QQcmdZViewItemQQimsxZ20090429?IMSfp=TL090429123001r1764

HALAL AND KASHRUT – DUAL CERTIFICATION? JOINT CERTIFICATION?

It took over thirty years from when Rabbi Zalman Schachter-Shalomi first began speaking of ecokashrut, until the formation of Magen Tzedek as an organizational context for evaluating ethics in kashrut.

Over thirty years ago I would often hear Reb Zalman ask why it was that Jews and Muslims could not stand together in peaceful prayer at Hebron and acknowledge that Father Abraham, Ibrahim was father to both Jews and Muslims. I don’t know if this will ever happen, and yet the hope that perhaps Jews and Muslims can make peace in the Holy Land, and throughout the world has motivated me totake on this research topic. As a step in that direction, and by way of conclusion, I advocate the following:

HALAL-KOSHER EDUCATION

There is a complexity in many of the details of laws of kashrut and halal. These need to be
examined in great details, through study groups of interested parties, from the standpoint of deep ecumenism looking for ways in which effective collaboration can take place.

DUAL HALAL-KOSHER CERTIFICATION

In the realm of industry and food marketing, there can be developments in advocating for
products to have both kosher and halal certification. This will required collaborative work between organizations in the Jewish community and in the Muslim community. I believe the initial work of Hekhsher Tzedek will pave the way for more open dialog with other Muslim groups as the Muslim community begins also to take on issues of ethics in the slaughter of animals.

JOINT HALAL-KOSHER CERTIFICATION

I would hope to see the day when there can be a joint Halal-Kosher certification, HK. I
recognize there are all kinds of religious, political and organizational hurdles to cross to get to this place. But it can begin small scale, even at a local level. Most likely it will need to be a product certification that does not include meat. I think an ethic of vegetarianism and care for the earth, as well as am embrace of a deep ecumenism is the model to underlie creation of joint Halal-Kosher certification HK.

HALAL-KOSHER RESTAURANTS

I would also hope to see the kind of restaurants that were created in Montreal, and that exist on
college campuses, restaurants which have a creative way of navigating through the complexities of Muslim and Jewish food laws, in search of a higher ethic of collaboration and sharing. Personal I think vegetarian and fish restaurants will be the way to go. But that is for another research paper. Finally, realizing this continues to be a work in progress, to end, I offer a mythic, Midrashi image to inspire the sharing of food between Jews and Muslims.

JACOB’S STEW – A VISION OF SHARING OF FOOD BETWEEN MUSLIMS AND JEWS

The Book of Genesis speaks of the death of the Patriarch Abraham, whom Muslims
refer to as Ibrahim, father of Isaac and Ishmael. After breathing his last at a good old
age (Gen. 25:8), Torah describes how “his sons Isaac and Ishmael buried him in the
cave of Machpelah, in the field of Ephron the son of Zohar the Hittite, which is before
Mamre” (Gen. 25:9). In what seemed to be a final act of reconciliation the two brothers
stood side by side at Hebron, burying their father Abraham, mourning his death.
In the next chapter of the Torah, we come across a passage describing the culinary
activities of Abraham’s grandsons. “And Jacob cooked pottage; and Esau came from
the field, and he was famished. And Esau said to Jacob, Feed me, I beg you, with that
same red pottage; for I am famished. The text then informs us: “Then Jacob gave
Esau bread and pottage of lentils; and he did eat and drink, and rose up, and went
his way.” (Gen. 26:29-30; 34)

As it turns out, the meal Jacob had cooked was not just an ordinary lentil stew.
According to Midrash Tanhuma (Buber, Toldot 3), following the death of Abraham
Jacob was preparing food for mourners. We can imagine he carted a large pot of
pottage to Mamre, especially for those mourning Abraham’s death. And who were the
mourners? None other than his father Isaac and his Uncle Ishmael. This was clearly to
be a meal of comfort and reconciliation.

Isaac and Ishmael, symbolically the progenitors of Judaism and Islam, not only
buried their father together, but shared Jacob’s lentil stew, and probably bread and
drink. And, we might assume that as mourners sharing of sacred food they were
brought more closely together in their grief and loss. Jacob’s stew was a healing meal
between two alienated brothers. Hinei matov u’manayim, shevet akhim gam yakhad.
It is a statement of the obvious to say relations between the descendents of Isaac
and Ishmael, particularly in this century, have not been all that fraternal. In bringing
together the essential values underlying both eco-kashrut and deep ecumenism, I
envision that the Children of Abraham, Ibrahim, can find ways to sit at the same table,
learning to share food with one another.

Hinei matov u’manayim, shevet akhim gam yakhad.

FOOTNOTES AND REFERENCES
1 “Inaugural Address – January 20, 2009; 44th President of the United States Barack Obama”
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/President_Barack_Obamas_Inaug…
2 http://www.religioustolerance.org/isl_numb.htm.
3 Nancy Fuchs-Kreimer, “Teaching Islam to Rabbinical Students” The Reconstructionist Vol. 72, No. 1 (Fall
2007) p. 14.
4 Ibid, p. 13.
5 Arthur Waskow, Down-to-Earth Judaism (New York: William and Morrow, 1995), p. 117.
6 Arthur Waskow, “Down-to-Earth Judaism – Food, Sex and Money” in Tikkun .. to heal, repair and transform
the world, edited by Michael Lerner (Oakland: Tikkun Books, 1992). (Original article(s) published in
Tikkun, January/February 1988, March/April 1988.)
7 Among the conferences: Food, The Earth and Jewish Ethics Conference at Bethesda-Chevy Chase High School
Sponsored by Am Kolel in co-operation with Shomrei Adamah DC, Jewish Vegetarians of North America,
the Shalom Center and the Washington Jewish Week. Presenters: Art Waskow, Richard Schwartz and
others. 200 people attended. See also Leon Cohen, “Waskow’s eco-kashrut to headline state
conference”, Wisconsin Jewish Chronicle, (January 23, 2004).
8 Arthur Waskow, Down-to-Earth Judaism.
9 See Ellen Bernstein and Dan Fink, Let the Earth Teach You Torah (Philadelphia: Shomrei Adamah, 1992).
10 The Jewish Reconstructructionist Federation has been active in this area, for example:
“JRF Conference Call, “Greening Synagogues and Living a Sustainable Life Rooted in Jewish Values” (June 6,
2007)
11 Roberta Kalechofsky, “Judaism and Vegetarianism” The Reconstructionist (March-April 1987), pp. 14-17.
12 http://www.hazon.org/
13 http://jcarrot.org/
14 An early article written was Aaron Gross, “When Kosher Isn’t Kosher” Tikkun, No. 20, No. 2 (March/April
2005) 52-55.
15 The story that spead the news widely in the Jewish world was: Nathaniel Popper, “In Iowa Meat Plant,
Kosher ‘Jungle’ Breeds Fear, Injury, Short Pay” The Jewish Forward (May 26, 2006). See also Phylis
Klasky, “Is Kosher Slaughtering Inhumane?” Moment, (February 1991) 40-54; 54-55.
16 In recent email correspodance with Arthur Waskow regarding the “mainstreaming of ethical kashrut” he
wrote: “I would say the biggest down-side of the mainstreaming has been that it applied eco-kosher to
food alone.”. Personal email correspondance, May 5, 2009.
17 According to Rabbi Morris Allen, he first spoke publically about Hekhsher Tzedek on Yom Kippur 2006 when
he was beginning to get the Agriproccesors company to begin to change their orientation. Personal email
correspondance, May 6, 2009.
18 Report of the Commission of Inquiry, (December 12, 2006) p. 3.
http://magentzedek.org/pdfs/Report%20of%20the%20Commission%20of%20Inquir…
20
19 Ibid.
20 Avram Israel Reisner, Hekhsher Tzedek – Al Pi Din (New York: Hekhsher Tzedek Commission of the Rabbinical
Assembly and the United Synagogue Council of Conservative Judaism, 2008) p. 2.
21 http://magentzedek.org/pdfs/Policy%20Statement%20and%20Guidelines.pdf
22 http://magentzedek.org/
23 Ibid.
24 We similar find attitudes in Shulkhan Arukh, YD 122, and in The Book of Holiness, “Laws of Forbidden
Foods”.
25 There is pioneering work being done in the contemporary Jewish community, not to encourage intermarriage,
but rather to welcome inter-married couples and families into Jewish community and
synagogue life. See for example, the national advocacy and education work of organization’s such as
Kerry Orlitsky’s Jewish Outreach Institute: http://joi.org/qa/index.shtml; and Kerry M. Olitzky and Joan
Peterson Littman, Making a Successful Jewish Interfaith Marriage: The Jewish Outreach Institute Guide
to Opportunites, Challenges and Resources (Woodstock VT: Jewish Light, 1992); and on a regional level,
the work on Interfaithways – The Interfaith Support Network of the Greater Philadelphia area under the
Rabbinic Directorship of Rabbi Geela Rayzel Raphael – www.interfaithways.com.
26 Lance Sussman, “The Myth of the Trefa Banquet: American Culinary Culture and the Radicalization of Food
Policy in American Reform Judaism” American Jewish Archives Journal 57,1-2 (2005) 29-52.
27 Matthew Fox, (Ed.) One River, Many Wells: Wisdom Springing from Global Faiths (Los Angles: Jeremy
Tarcher, 2002) p. 5.
28 My thanks to Chaya Gusfield who helped me see the link of Mathew Fox’s “Deep Ecumenism” and issues of
kashrut and halal. Chaya Gusfield, “Sacred Eating in Islam and Judaism: A Place to Come Together”,
unpublished paper, 2005.
29 Giora Shimoni, “What is Treif?” http://kosherfood.about.com/od/kosherbasics/f/treif.htm.
30 According to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halal:
In Arabic-speaking countries, the term is used to describe anything permissible under Islamic law,
in contrast to haraam, that which is forbidden. This includes human behavior, speech
communication, clothing, conduct, manner and dietary laws. In non-Arabic-speaking countries,
the term is most commonly used in the narrower context of just Muslim dietary laws, especially
where meat and poultry are concerned, though it can be used for the more general meaning, as
well.
31 J.R. Sulan (ed.), A Conversation Between Muslims, Christians and Jews (Adelaide, South
Australia: Project Abraham, 2006), pp. 34-48.
See http://www.projectabraham.org.au/files/projectabrahambookletapril2007.pdf
32 J.M. Regenstein, M.M. Chaudry, and C.E. Regenstein, “The Kosher and Halal Food Laws” Comprehensive
Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, Vol. 2 (2003) 111-127.
33 Harold Kushner, To Life! A Celebration of Jewish Being and Thinking (New York: Warner Books, 1993) pp. 55-
60.
21
34 Texts are adapted from http://jews-for-allah.org/Jews-and-Muslims-Agree/halal_is_kosher.htm. This
document is found on a website www.ConvertsToIslam.org. It has its stated purpose to do outreach to
members of other religions, including Jews. Hence, it attempts to demonstrate a close similarity
between laws of kashrut and laws of halal. It does also demonstrate the differences.
35 Email correspondence with Dr. Khalid Blankinship, May 4, 2009.
36Section which follows is based on: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_and_Jewish_dietary_laws_compared,
http://meat.tamu.edu/kosher.html, and J.M. Regenstein, M.M. Chaudry, and C.E. Regenstein, “Kosher
and halal in the biotechnology era” Applied Biotechnology, Food and Science Policy, I, 2 (2003) 95-107.
37 See Vivian Mann, et. al. (Eds), Convivencia: Jews, Muslims, and Christians in Medieval Spain (New York; The
Jewish Musuem, 1992).
38 David Friedenreich, Email communication through the H-JUDAIC Digest (#2009-79), May 6, 2009. See also
Friedenreich, Foreign Food, Doctoral Dissertation, Columbia University, 2006.
39 Bill Brownstein, “Partners in Peace – And Food” Common Ground News Service, 15 July 2005.
http://www.commongroundnews.org/article.php?id=853&lan=en&sid=0&sp=0
40 Haim Rivlin, “Where halal meets kashrut” Haaretz, (July 8, 2005).
41 Email correspondence with Montreal Gazette reporter Bill Brownstein, May 3, 2009.
42 Personal phone conversation with Rene Kroll, Union Manager, Dining Services, Mount Holyoke College, May 5,
2009. See also Fred LeBlanc, “Details, Details: The Making of a Kosher/Halal Dining Facility” Mount
Holyoke College Street Journal (Sept. 7, 2001).
http://www.mtholyoke.edu/offices/comm/csj/090701/dining.shtml.
43 Michael J. Friedman, “Muslim, Jewish Communities Secure Halal-Kosher Labeling Law” America.gov, (18
September 2006).
Diverse communities in Virginia work to further common interests
44 J.M. Regenstein, M.M. Chaudry, and C.E. Regenstein, “Kosher and halal in the biotechnology era” p. 97.
45 Sue Fishkoff, “”Dietary Changes Afoot, But Are They Kosher?” Jewish Telegraphic Agency, (October 29,
2008).
46 Telephone conversation with Dr. Farhat Quadri, Director of Community Service, Islamic Food and Nutrition
Council, May 5, 2009.

Paper submitted in fulfillment of
PHI 352
Ethics of Kashrut
Academy of Jewish Religion
Rabbi Jill Hammer
May 2009